Melanie Klein and Object Relations

Overview of Object Relations Theory

Many personality theorists have accepted some of Freud’s basic assumptions while rejecting others. One approach to extending psychodynamic theory has been the object relations theories of Melanie Klein and others. Unlike Jung and Adler who came to reject Freud’s ideas, Klein tried to validate Freud’s theories. In essence, Klein extended Freud’s developmental stages downward to the first 4 to 6 months after birth.

Biography of Melanie Klein

melanie klein, melanie klein object relations, melanie klein freud, writings of melanie klein, work of melanie klein, wikipedia melanie klein, who was melanie klein, transferencia melanie klein, transference melanie klein, the selected melanie klein, the girl in melanie klein, teorias de la personalidad melanie klein, teoria melanie klein, teoria de melanie klein, student papers on melanie klein, splitting melanie klein, selected melanie klein, resumen melanie klein, reading melanie klein, quotes melanie klein, psychoanalysis of children melanie klein, projective identification melanie klein, play therapy melanie klein, paintings of melanie klein, object relations theory melanie klein, object relations theory and melanie klein, melanie klein was, melanie klein today, melanie klein theory on bipolar depression, melanie klein theory, melanie klein the drive toward intimacy, melanie klein techinque, melanie klein sus criticas, melanie klein shock doctrine, melanie klein shock, melanie klein scotland world war two, melanie klein school, melanie klein said, melanie klein reparation, melanie klein psychology, melanie klein psychologist, melanie klein psychoanalytic pathological guilt, melanie klein psychoanalytic guilt, melanie klein psychoanalyst son, melanie klein psychoanalysis, melanie klein projection and introjection, melanie klein projection, melanie klein play in children, melanie klein pitlochry meltzer, melanie klein part objects, melanie klein paranoid schizoid position, melanie klein paranoid schizoid, melanie klein multiple personality disorder, melanie klein mother and daughter relationships, melanie klein hanna segal, melanie klein estructura psiquica, melanie klein envy, melanie klein creativity quote, melanie klein creativity, melanie klein contributions and concepts, melanie klein books, melanie klein biography, melanie klein art, melanie klein application, melanie klein anxiety, melanie klein anorexia oedipus, melanie klein annihilation anxiety, melanie klein and psychologist, melanie klein and personality theory, melanie klein and object relations, melanie klein and alliance, journal of melanie klein and object relations, journal of melanie klein, introyeccion melanie klein, introduction to the work of melanie klein, introduccion melanie klein, hannah siegel melanie klein, good breast bad breast melanie klein, gomez writing on melanie klein, envy and gratitude melanie klein, envidia y celos en melanie klein, envidia melanie klein, el juego segun melanie klein, dr melanie klein, depressive position melanie klein, depression and melanie klein, criticisms of melanie klein, contributions of melanie klein, china cctv melanie klein, bion melanie klein london org, biography of melanie klein, amazon melanie klein, susan isaacs klein melanie, melanie j klein brooklyn, melanie christine klein, klein melanie geb darkow, klein melanie darkow, melanie klein theories, melanie klein splitting, melanie klein quotes, melanie klein play therapy, melanie klein object relations theory, melanie klein object relation, hanna segal melanie klein, melanie kleine,  melany klein, melanie klein's theory, melanie klein's theories, wikipedia klein melanie, klein melanie theory, klein melanie, object relations theory, winnicott object relations theory, what is object relations theory, summary of object relations theory, stages of the object relations theory, psychology object relations theory, psychodynamics object relations theory, psychoanalytic object relations theory, paper on object relations theory, object relations theory wikipedia, object relations theory wiki, object relations theory validity, object relations theory structure, object relations theory stages, object relations theory splitting, object relations theory reliability, object relations theory of the personality, object relations theory of personality, object relations theory melanie klein, object relations theory mahler adler, object relations theory mahler, object relations theory klien, object relations theory klein, object relations theory interventions, object relations theory gilligan, object relations theory early childhood attachment, object relations theory definition, object relations theory defined, object relations theory d w winnicott, object relations theory attachment styles, object relations theory assumptions, object relations theory articles, object relations theory and treatment goals, object relations theory and single parent, object relations theory and self psychology in social work practice, object relations theory and ocd, object relations theory and melanie klein, object relations theory and margaret mahler, object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis, object relations theory and absent parent, object relations theory abstracts, object relations theory absent parent, margaret mahler object relations theory summarized, margaret mahler object relations theory, manifestations of object relations theory, kernberg object relations theory, freudian lacanian and object relations theory, freud object relations theory, feminist object relations theory, fairbairn object relations theory, discussion on object relations theory, definition of object relations theory, critique of object relations theory, an object relations theory of the personality, satir object relation theory, object relations theories and psychopathology, object relation theory dreams, object relation theory by mahler, object relations in psychoanalytic theory, theory of object relations, object relations social work theory, object relations in psychoanalytic theory greenberg, mftsource theory object relations, victor daniels object relation theories, guntrip object relation theories, relative time to object theory, psychodynamic object relations theory, object relations theory winnicott, object relations theory psychology, melanie klein object relations theory, mahler object relations theory, klein object relations theory, define object relations theory, object relation theory,2 winnicott object relation theory, objects relations theory, objective relations theory, object relations theories, object relational theory, object relation theory klein, object relations psychoanalytic theory, object relations in psychoanalytical theory, objects relation theory, object relation theories,

Melanie Klein and Object Relations Theory

Melanie Klein was born in Vienna in 1892, the youngest of four children. She had neither a PhD nor an MD degree but became an analyst by being psychoanalyzed. As an analyst, she specialized in working with young children. In 1927, she moved to London where she practiced until her death in 1960.

Introduction to Object Relations Theory

Object relations theory differs from Freudian theory in three important ways: (1) it places more emphasis on interpersonal relationships, (2) it stresses the infant’s relationship with the mother rather than the father, and (3) it suggests that people are motivated primarily for human contact rather than for sexual pleasure. The term object in object relations theory refers to any person or part of a person that infants introject, or take into their psychic structure and then later project onto other people.

Psychic Life of the Infant

Klein believed that infants begin life with an inherited predisposition to reduce the anxiety that they experience as a consequence of the clash between the life instinct and the death instinct.

  • Fantasies
    • Klein assumed that very young infants possess an active, unconscious fantasy life. Their most basic fantasies are images of the “good” breast and the “bad” breast.
  • Objects
    • Klein agreed with Freud that drives have an object, but she was more likely to emphasize the child’s relationship with these objects (parents‘ face, hands, breast, penis, etc.), which she saw as having a life of their own within the child’s fantasy world.
  • Positions
    • In their attempts to reduce the conflict produced by good and bad images, infants organize their experience into positions, or ways of dealing with both internal and external objects.
  • Paranoid-Schizoid Position
    • The struggles that infants experience with the good breast and the bad breast lead to two separate and opposing feelings—a desire to harbor the breast and a desire to bite or destroy it. To tolerate these two feelings, the ego splits itself by retaining parts of its life and death instincts while projecting other parts onto the breast. It then has a relationship with the ideal breast and the persecutory breast. To control this situation, infants adopt the paranoid-schizoid position, which is a tendency to see the world as having both destructive and omnipotent qualities.
  • Depressive Position
    • By depressive position, Klein meant the anxiety that infants experience around 6 months of age over losing their mother and yet, at the same time, wanting to destroy her. The depressive position is resolved when infants fantasize that they have made up for their previous transgressions against their mother and also realize that their mother will not abandon them.

Psychic Defense Mechanisms in Object Relations Theory

  • According to Klein, children adopt various psychic defense mechanisms to protect their egos against anxiety aroused by their own destructive fantasies.
  • Introjection
    • Klein defined introjection as the fantasy of taking into one’s own body the images that one has of an external object, especially the mother’s breast. Infants usually introject good objects as a protection against anxiety, but they also introject bad objects in order to gain control of them.
  • Projection
    • The fantasy that one’s own feelings and impulses reside within another person is called projection. Children project both good and bad images, especially onto their parents.
  • Splitting
    • Infants tolerate good and bad aspects of themselves and of external objects by splitting, or mentally keeping apart, incompatible images. Splitting can be beneficial to both children and adults, because it allows them to like themselves while still recognizing some unlikable qualities.
  • Projective Identification
    • Projective identification is the psychic defense mechanism whereby infants split off unacceptable parts of themselves, project them onto another object, and finally introject them in an altered form.

Internalizations in Object Relations Theory

After introjecting external objects, infants organize them into a psychologically meaningful framework, a process that Klein called internalization.

  • Ego
    • Internalizations are aided by the early ego’s ability to feel anxiety, to use defense mechanisms, and to form object relations in both fantasy and reality. However, a unified ego emerges only after first splitting itself into the two parts—those that deal with the life instinct and those that relate to the death instinct.
  • Superego
    • Klein believed that the superego emerged much earlier than Freud had held. To her, the superego preceded rather than followed the Oedipus complex. Klein also saw the superego as being quite harsh and cruel.
  • Oedipus Complex
    • Klein believed that the Oedipus complex begins during the first few months of life, then reaches its zenith during the genital stage, at about 3 or 4 years of age—the same time that Freud had suggested it began. Klein also believed that much of the Oedipus complex is based on children’s fear that their parents will seek revenge against them for their fantasy of emptying the parent’s body. For healthy development during the Oedipal years, children should retain positive feelings for each parent. According to Klein, the little boy adopts a “feminine” position very early in life and has no fear of being castrated as punishment for his sexual feelings toward his mother. Later, he projects his destructive drive onto his father, whom he fears will bite or castrate him. The male Oedipus complex is resolved when the boy establishes good relations with both parents. The little girl also adopts a “feminine” position toward both parents quite early in life. She has a positive feeling for both her mother’s breast and her father’s penis, which she believes will feed her with babies. Sometimes the girl develops hostility toward her mother, whom she fears will retaliate against her and rob her of her babies, but in most cases, the female Oedipus complex is resolved without any jealousy toward the mother.

Later Views of Object Relations

A number of other theorists have expanded and altered Klein’s theory of object relations. Notable among them are Margaret Mahler, Heinz Kohut, John Bowlby. and Mary Ainsworth.

  • Margaret Mahler’s View
    • Mahler, a native of Hungary who practiced psychoanalysis in both Vienna and New York, developed her theory of object relations from careful observations of infants as they bonded with their mothers during their first 3 years of life. In their progress toward achieving a sense of identity, children pass through a series of three major developmental stages. First is normal autism, which covers the first 3 to 4 weeks of life, a time when infants satisfy their needs within the all-powerful protective orbit of their mother’s care. Second is normal symbiosis, when infants behave as if they and their mother were an omnipotent, symbiotic unit. Third is separation-individuation, from about 4 months until about 3 years, a time when children are becoming psychologically separated from their mothers and achieving individuation, or a sense of personal identity.
  • Heinz Kohut’s View
    • Kohut was a native of Vienna who spent most of his professional life in the United States. More than any of the other object relations theorists, Kohut emphasized the development of the self. In caring for their physical and psychological needs, adults treat infants as if they had a sense of self. The parents’ behaviors and attitudes eventually help children form a sense of self that gives unity and consistency to their experiences.
  • John Bowlby’s Attachment Theory
    • Bowlby, a native of England, received training in child psychiatry from Melanie Klein. By studying human and other primate infants, Bowlby observed three stages of separation anxiety: (1) protest, (2) apathy and despair, and (3) emotional detachment from people, including the primary caregiver. Children who reach the third stage of separation anxiety lack warmth and emotion in their later relationships.
  • Mary Ainsworth and the Strange Situation
    • Mary Ainsworth was born in Ohio in 1919 and died in 1999. She and her colleagues developed a technique called the Strange Situation for measuring one of three the types of attachment styles—secure attachment, anxious-resistant attachment, and anxious-avoidant attachment.

Psychotherapy in in Object Relations Theory

The goal of Klein’s therapy was to reduce depressive anxieties and persecutory fears and to lessen the harshness of internalized objects. To do this, Klein encouraged patients to reexperience early fantasies and pointed out the differences between conscious and unconscious wishes.

Critique of Object Relations Theory

Object relations theory shares with Freudian theory an inability to be either falsified or verified through empirical research. Nevertheless, some clinicians regard the theory as being a useful guide to action and as possessing substantial internal consistency. However, the theory must be rated low on parsimony and also low on its ability to organize knowledge and to generate research.

Concept of Humanity

Object relations theorists see personality as being a product of the early mother-child relationship, and thus they stress determinism over free choice. The powerful influence of early childhood also gives these theories a low rating on uniqueness, a very high rating on social influences, and high ratings on causality and unconscious forces. Klein and other object relations theorists rate average on optimism versus pessimism.

Cool Related Sites!

Reply